<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calculating Surplus Income &#8211; Directive No. 11R2 &#8211; 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grossmancga.com/site</link>
	<description>Independent advice in your best interest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Grossman, CGA</title>
		<link>http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/comment-page-1/#comment-9468</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Grossman, CGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grossmancga.com/site/?page_id=129#comment-9468</guid>
		<description>Household income $4200 - Superintendent&#039;s Standard $2948 = Surplus income of household $1252
Bankrupt&#039;s share = $1252 x $0/$4200 = $0. That is, there is no surplus income for the bankrupt.

Best regards,

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Household income $4200 &#8211; Superintendent&#8217;s Standard $2948 = Surplus income of household $1252<br />
Bankrupt&#8217;s share = $1252 x $0/$4200 = $0. That is, there is no surplus income for the bankrupt.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nael</title>
		<link>http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/comment-page-1/#comment-9434</link>
		<dc:creator>Nael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grossmancga.com/site/?page_id=129#comment-9434</guid>
		<description>I have a challenging question on bankrupt payment calculation: 
For the family of three ,with the Bankrupt income  &quot;0&quot; (for for the period over one year)and  the spousal net income 4200, with no joined loans  in this case, how much  payment required ?
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a challenging question on bankrupt payment calculation:<br />
For the family of three ,with the Bankrupt income  &#8220;0&#8243; (for for the period over one year)and  the spousal net income 4200, with no joined loans  in this case, how much  payment required ?<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Grossman, CGA</title>
		<link>http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/comment-page-1/#comment-5193</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Grossman, CGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grossmancga.com/site/?page_id=129#comment-5193</guid>
		<description>Hello, Richard:
Ask your Trustee whether they will permit you to include this allowance both as income and as a non-discretionary work expense on your monthly statement of income and expenses. This would have the effect of eliminating such work allowances from surplus income.
Best regards,
Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Richard:<br />
Ask your Trustee whether they will permit you to include this allowance both as income and as a non-discretionary work expense on your monthly statement of income and expenses. This would have the effect of eliminating such work allowances from surplus income.<br />
Best regards,<br />
Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/comment-page-1/#comment-5187</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grossmancga.com/site/?page_id=129#comment-5187</guid>
		<description>I work at an occupation where I work away from home in other towns when I am on shift. I am paid a daily subsistence amount of $40/day in addition to my wages. My company indicates this subsistence amount on my pay slips, but adds it to the total of my net pay, effectively causing me to have to remit roughly 50% of it as surplus income payments.

Is there a way for this amount to at least partly be qualified as being acceptable as an expense required for employment (as mentioned in Section 5 (3)(f))? Are there any trustee forms that can be used to outline such expenses?

I am just asking as it adds a hefty amount to my monthly surplus income payments and makes it difficult to live out of town for work. I want to keep working to pay as much as possible to my estate, but a little relief for some work expenses would definitely be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work at an occupation where I work away from home in other towns when I am on shift. I am paid a daily subsistence amount of $40/day in addition to my wages. My company indicates this subsistence amount on my pay slips, but adds it to the total of my net pay, effectively causing me to have to remit roughly 50% of it as surplus income payments.</p>
<p>Is there a way for this amount to at least partly be qualified as being acceptable as an expense required for employment (as mentioned in Section 5 (3)(f))? Are there any trustee forms that can be used to outline such expenses?</p>
<p>I am just asking as it adds a hefty amount to my monthly surplus income payments and makes it difficult to live out of town for work. I want to keep working to pay as much as possible to my estate, but a little relief for some work expenses would definitely be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Grossman, CGA</title>
		<link>http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/comment-page-1/#comment-5042</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Grossman, CGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grossmancga.com/site/?page_id=129#comment-5042</guid>
		<description>If you look at Subsection 5(2) of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Directive on surplus income&lt;/a&gt; you see that only the &quot;minimum statutory remittances&quot; are allowed as deductions from gross income. Accordingly, if you voluntarily increase the tax withheld at source, that increase will not change the surplus income calculation. Additionally, as your question suggests you already suspect, this strategy is clearly aimed at an illegal evasion of the statutory surplus income provisions.
Please feel free to contact me directly with any further questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at Subsection 5(2) of the <a href="http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/" rel="nofollow">Directive on surplus income</a> you see that only the &#8220;minimum statutory remittances&#8221; are allowed as deductions from gross income. Accordingly, if you voluntarily increase the tax withheld at source, that increase will not change the surplus income calculation. Additionally, as your question suggests you already suspect, this strategy is clearly aimed at an illegal evasion of the statutory surplus income provisions.<br />
Please feel free to contact me directly with any further questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/comment-page-1/#comment-5032</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grossmancga.com/site/?page_id=129#comment-5032</guid>
		<description>If I have more tax taken off of my pay to reduce the surplus income payment payable (effectively making no surplus payable during the course of my bankruptcy)is this an offence or an issue when it comes to my discharge? The way I see it, the trustee will receive a larger post tax refund in the case of my filing in the early part of 2011.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I have more tax taken off of my pay to reduce the surplus income payment payable (effectively making no surplus payable during the course of my bankruptcy)is this an offence or an issue when it comes to my discharge? The way I see it, the trustee will receive a larger post tax refund in the case of my filing in the early part of 2011.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Grossman, CGA</title>
		<link>http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Grossman, CGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grossmancga.com/site/?page_id=129#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Hello, Susan:  NEL payments received during bankruptcy are added to total income in the surplus income calculation, so a portion will be paid to the estate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Susan:  NEL payments received during bankruptcy are added to total income in the surplus income calculation, so a portion will be paid to the estate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://grossmancga.com/site/canadian-bankruptcy-rules/surplus-income-in-canadian-bankruptcy/calculating-surplus-income-directive-no-11r2/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grossmancga.com/site/?page_id=129#comment-127</guid>
		<description>what is Non-Economic-Loss  from Workplace safety and Insurance Board classified under in the Surplus Income Laws?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is Non-Economic-Loss  from Workplace safety and Insurance Board classified under in the Surplus Income Laws?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

