by Marc Weisman & Alison Ronson of Torkin Manes LLP
Viewers of detective dramas know that accused persons refuse to speak without their lawyer present. A visit from a Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) auditor may not be quite as dramatic but the consequences can be drastic. Let’s create our own fictional case to see why.
Imagine a client of mine, who we will call “Bart,” owns all of the shares of a corporation that builds and sells condominiums. Ever since his mother “Marge” kicked his father “Homer” out of the house, Bart has been letting his dad stay in one of the unsold, unoccupied condominiums in his newest development. Since Marge has the family car, Bart also gave Homer a company vehicle to keep.
It seems like an ideal situation for all parties: Bart is doing a good deed for his father, Marge has the house to herself and Homer has a free place to stay and free transportation. Unfortunately, one day the CRA calls Bart to tell him that they will be auditing his corporation. Regrettably, Bart fails to inform me of the upcoming audit.
