Tag Archive: insolvency

Canadian asset performance – a relative story

by Mark McElheran of Stikeman Elliott LLP

It remains to be seen whether the reform fever that is presently sweeping through the US securitization market will continue unabated across the 49th parallel but there is no question that these monumental reforms have given rise to a considerable amount of discussion and debate over the appropriateness of similar reforms in Canada. This was perhaps inevitable given the degree of economic integration between the two countries and the fact that both have recently suffered through significant ABS-induced crises (albeit on entirely different scales).

Dividends and Accountants’ Risks

A recent discussion with colleagues revealed that many are unaware of the issues that may arise when advising clients whether to declare corporate dividends, including in the case where there exist negative retained earnings.

From the viewpoint of an insolvency practitioner, the picture is quite clear.

A trustee of a bankrupt corporation is permitted to make an application in court to recover against the directors where the corporation has, within the year prior to bankruptcy, redeemed or

Another Corporate Director/Lender Must Pay

On October 6, 2010, in Seier v. The Queen, the Tax Court of Canada provided us with one more example of a lender and corporate director who must pay the GST and payroll withholdings arrears of a failed business.

In this case, a lender, by realizing on his security, becomes the sole director and shareholder of the borrower corporation. He then fails to monitor the corporation’s compliance with the various GST and payroll tax requirements.  As a result, the corporation accumulates in these accounts $60,000 outstanding for which the lender, as corporate director, is assessed.

The Court’s decision is instructive since it paints a picture of absentee management that is common and likely found within your own experience.

Lenders (who upon a liquidation are liable for such debts out of the proceeds) and directors (who are directly liable for such debts) must have monitoring systems in place to limit this risk.

I suggest that some combination of the following could be used to reduce risk:

  1. Use of a third-party payroll service, with all remittances to be made by the service.
  2. All payroll and GST/HST assessments and statements are forwarded for review immediately upon receipt.
  3. An independent accountant is engaged by the lender/director for periodic review of underlying calculations with the accountant’s fees reimbursed by the corporation.
  4. The lender’s/director’s own bookkeeper/accountant provides this periodic review.

If you are using any of these controls, or some other one, please share it by clicking on “Leave a comment” at the top of this post.

Forgive us our Debts as We Forgive our Debtors – Bankruptcy and the Bible

By O. Max Gardner III

Originally published at: http://bit.ly/cceEC6

Dalton Camp proclaimed [Ed.: in Canada's defunct Saturday Night Magazine] several years ago that “having lost its value, money may no longer be the root of all evil; credit having taken its place.” This statement demonstrates the paradox of modern day Christianity and debt—should the Christian reaction be one of condemnation or one of compassion. Since many recent respected studies have shown that the average American family is only three weeks away from personal bankruptcy, and since Congress is on the verge of passing legislation that will deny bankruptcy relief to hundreds of thousands of American families, it is time to revisit what the Bible teaches us about debt.

The Bible makes it clear that people are generally expected to pay their debts. Leviticus 25:39. No one in support of or in opposition to the Bankruptcy Reform Bill presently before Congress has advanced any argument against this general proposition. However, this moral and legal obligation to pay just debts must be balanced by such considerations as the need for compassion and the call to cancel debts at periodic intervals. The Biblical basis for such considerations is based on the sabbatical and Jubilee years. The secular basis arises out of the Constitutional of Congress to enact uniform laws allowing businesses and consumers to cancel and to restructure debt obligations. This Biblical support for the legal right to cancel debt is enforced by the even stronger Biblical doctrine that prohibited interest of any amount rather than just usury or excessive interest.

Within the areas of economic justice and stability, the Old Testament is replete with examples of compassionate treatment of the poor, and with preservation of the family unit. These goals were superior to the material concerns of repayment of debt. For instance

Set Offs Endangered – Security Deposits May Be Unsecured

Caisse Drummond Supreme Court of Canada Decision

by James H. Archer and Candace Pallone of McCarthy Tétrault LLP

In June of 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed an appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal in the Caisse populaire Desjardins de l’Est de Drummond v. Canada case.

The facts of this case are as follows: On September 18, 2000, Caisse populaire Desjardins de l’Est de Drummond (Caisse Drummond)

GrossmanCGA earns mention in CGA Canada magazine

This site earned a first-column mention in the March-April issue of CGA Magazine, distributed by the national association to about 68,000 members and students. Have a look: http://bit.ly/CGAMagazine

Thank you, readers!